humanoidsdata.com

Search

Search companies, datasets, articles, and glossary terms for humanoids and embodied AI.

← All glossary terms

Data & collection

Human–robot interaction

Human–robot interaction is the exchange of information and actions between people and robots while performing a task, and the field that studies how such systems are designed and evaluated. It includes remote operation, supervision, collaboration, physical interaction and social communication rather than only face-to-face conversation.

Also known as: HRI, human-robot interaction, human robot interaction

Updated

Interaction requires an exchange

ISO 8373:2021 defines human–robot interaction through information and action exchanges between a person and a robot to perform a task by means of a user interface. Speech, gesture, touch, displays, controls and robot motion can all carry part of that exchange.

Mere co-location is not enough to describe the interaction. A person visible in a robot’s camera may be a bystander rather than a participant. An HRI record should identify who communicated what, through which channel, and how the robot’s subsequent behaviour depended on it.

HRI spans remote, proximate and shared-control settings

The foundational Goodrich and Schultz survey frames HRI as the study of understanding, designing and evaluating robotic systems for use by or with humans. It includes remote teleoperation and supervisory control as well as co-located assistance, collaboration, physical interaction and social behaviour.

The allocation of control can change during one task. A person may choose a goal, the robot may navigate autonomously, and the person may intervene for an unfamiliar manipulation. Describing that sequence is more informative than labelling the entire system either manual or autonomous.

HRI data carries human context and risk

Useful records can combine robot state, commands, dialogue, gaze, gestures, contact, task outcomes and intervention events. They should preserve timing and participant roles without implying that proximity, eye direction or speech automatically proves intent.

Human recordings can contain faces, voices, locations and behavioural signals. Collection therefore needs consent, privacy controls and documented access conditions. Safety events, near misses and operator overrides should remain visible rather than being removed as failed demonstrations.

ISO uses “HRI” for human–robot interaction and advises against using the same abbreviation for the interface itself. Keeping the interaction, interface and participants distinct prevents ambiguous dataset labels.

Sources